000 | 01384 a2200205 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c26813 _d26813 |
||
020 | _a9781107502680 | ||
082 |
_a322.40973 _bCOL-O |
||
100 | _aCollins, Ronald K.L. | ||
100 | _aSkover, David M. | ||
245 |
_aOn Dissent _b : Its Meaning in America |
||
260 |
_bCambridge University Press _c2015 |
||
300 | _a200, pp. | ||
520 | _aAmerica values dissent. It tolerates, encourages and protects it. But what is this thing we value? That is a question never asked. 'Dissent' is treated as a known fact. For all that has been said about it - in books, articles, judicial opinions, and popular culture - it is remarkable that no one has devoted much, if any, ink to explaining what dissent is. No one has attempted to sketch its philosophical, linguistic, legal or cultural meanings or usages. There is a need to develop some clarity about this phenomenon, for not every difference of opinion, symbolic gesture, public activity in opposition to government policy, incitement to direct action, revolutionary effort or political assassination need be tagged dissent. In essence, we have no conceptual yardstick. It is just that measure of meaning that On Dissent offers. | ||
650 | _aJudicial opinions | ||
650 | _aDissenting opinions | ||
650 | _aDissenters--Legal status, laws, etc | ||
650 | _aUnited States | ||
650 | _aGovernment, Resistance to | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |