000 | 01543 a2200241 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c26790 _d26790 |
||
020 | _a9781107565609 | ||
082 |
_a349.73082 _bFE- |
||
245 |
_aFeminist Judgments _b: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court |
||
260 |
_bCambridge University Press _c2016 |
||
300 | _a578,pp. | ||
520 | _aWhat would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were written with a feminist perspective? Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant US Supreme Court cases on gender from the 1800s to the present day. The twenty-five opinions in this volume demonstrate that judges with feminist viewpoints could have changed the course of the law. The rewritten decisions reveal that previously accepted judicial outcomes were not necessary or inevitable and demonstrate that feminist reasoning increases the judicial capacity for justice. Feminist Judgments opens a path for a long overdue discussion of the real impact of judicial diversity on the law as well as the influence of perspective on judging | ||
650 | _aDiscrimination--Law and legislation | ||
650 | _aWomen--Legal status | ||
650 | _aFeminism | ||
650 | _aFeminist jurisprudence | ||
650 | _aWomen--Legal status, laws, etc | ||
650 | _aEquality before the law | ||
650 |
_aUnited States _vUnited States. Supreme Court |
||
700 | _aStanchi, Kathryn M. | ||
700 | _aBerger, Linda L. | ||
700 | _aCrawford, Bridget J. | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |