Penal sanctioning in the United States : explaining cross-state differences / Frederique A. Laubepin.
By: Laubepin, Frederique A.
Publisher: El Paso : LFB Scholarly Publishing, 2015Description: xiv, 185p. illustrations.ISBN: 9781593327682 (hardcover : alk. paper).Subject(s): Imprisonment -- United States -- States | Prison sentences -- United States -- States | Corrections -- United States -- States | Criminal justice, Administration of -- United States -- States | Discrimination in criminal justice administration -- United States -- StatesDDC classification: 365.973 Summary: Laubepin investigates differences in the scope of penal sanctioning in the American states over a thirty-year period. Her analyses replicate and expand prior research examining the determinants of incarceration rates, and explore whether this theoretical framework can be usefully applied to back-end sentencing (parole revocation). She finds that states have responded to similar policy problems with solutions shaped by local social, political, economic and cultural conditions. Not only are these dynamics historically contingent, but they also play out differently at the front and back ends of the sentencing system. Unlike prior research, this study provides weak support for the influence of political factors, but points to the importance of practices of civic engagement instead, suggesting that penal sanctioning is driven by "top down" policies as well as "bottom up" democratic processes.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
NASSDOC Library | 365.973 LAU-P (Browse shelf) | Available | 53151 |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Laubepin investigates differences in the scope of penal sanctioning in the American states over a thirty-year period. Her analyses replicate and expand prior research examining the determinants of incarceration rates, and explore whether this theoretical framework can be usefully applied to back-end sentencing (parole revocation). She finds that states have responded to similar policy problems with solutions shaped by local social, political, economic and cultural conditions. Not only are these dynamics historically contingent, but they also play out differently at the front and back ends of the sentencing system. Unlike prior research, this study provides weak support for the influence of political factors, but points to the importance of practices of civic engagement instead, suggesting that penal sanctioning is driven by "top down" policies as well as "bottom up" democratic processes.
English.
There are no comments for this item.