Productivity and the Pandemic : challenges and insights from covid-19 / edited by Philip McCann (Professor of Urban and Regional Economics, University of Sheffield, UK) Tim Vorley (Pro Vice-Chancellor and Dean, Oxford Brookes Business School, Oxford Brookes University, UK).
Contributor(s): Vorley, Tim.
Publisher: UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2021Description: xxi, 305 pages.ISBN: 9781800374614.Subject(s): Industrial productivity | COVID-19 (Disease) -- Economic aspects | COVID-19 (Disease) -- Social aspects | COVID-19 (Disease) -- Economic aspects | COVID-19 (Disease) -- Social aspects | Industrial productivityDDC classification: 338.06 Summary: This book examines how an error in global meta-policy set climate change negotiations on an unproductive course. The decision to base negotiations on the Montreal Protocol and overlook the importance of interests, it argues, institutionalised an approach doomed to fail. By analysing interests, science and norms in the process, and the neglect of ‘interactive minilateralism’, learning was delayed until the more promising Paris Agreement was finally concluded, only to encounter a Trump Presidency, which (ironically) might offer further learning opportunities.| Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
NASSDOC Library | 338.06 PRO- (Browse shelf) | Available | 52089 |
Browsing NASSDOC Library Shelves Close shelf browser
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| 338.06 CAP-C Capabilities,Innovation And Economic Growth | 338.06 FUR-; International input-output analysis | 338.06 PRO- Productivity dynamics in emerging and industrialized countries | 338.06 PRO- Productivity and the Pandemic : | 338.0609485 FAR-I The impact of climate policy on environmental and economic performance : | 338.060954 RAS-I Industrial growth and employment: a regional analysis | 338.064 BAS-B The black box : |
This book examines how an error in global meta-policy set climate change negotiations on an unproductive course. The decision to base negotiations on the Montreal Protocol and overlook the importance of interests, it argues, institutionalised an approach doomed to fail. By analysing interests, science and norms in the process, and the neglect of ‘interactive minilateralism’, learning was delayed until the more promising Paris Agreement was finally concluded, only to encounter a Trump Presidency, which (ironically) might offer further learning opportunities.
There are no comments for this item.