India and bilateral investment treaties (Record no. 26156)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01938 a2200157 4500
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
ISBN 9780199493746
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 346.54092
Item number RAN-I
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--AUTHOR NAME
Personal name Ranjan, Prabhash
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title India and bilateral investment treaties
Sub Title : refusal, acceptance, backlash
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher Oxford University Press
Year of publication 2019
Place of publication New Delhi
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Number of Pages xxxiii, 378p.
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc Include Index<br/>
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Many countries have started contesting international investment treaties that allow foreign corporations to sue sovereign States for alleged treaty breaches at international arbitration fora. This contestation has taken the form of either countries terminating their investment treaties or walking out of the investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) system. India has also jumped on the contestation bandwagon. As a consequence of being sued by more than 20 foreign investors, India terminated close to 60 investment treaties and adopted a new model bilateral investment treaty (BIT) purportedly to balance investment protection with the host State's right to regulate. This book studies critically India's approach towards BITs by tracing its origin, evolution, and the current state of play. The book does so by locating it in India's economic policy in general and policy towards foreign investment in particular. India's approach towards BITs and its policy towards foreign investment were consistent with each other in the periods of economic nationalism (1947-1990) and economic liberalism (1991-2010). However, post 2010, India's approach to BITs has become protectionist while India's foreign investment policy continues to be liberal. In order to balance investment protection with the State's right to regulate, India needs to evolve its BIT practice based on the twin framework of international rule of law and embedded liberalism.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical Term International economic relations
Form subdivision Economic policy
-- Investments
-- Foreign
Geographic subdivision India
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Koha item type Books
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Source of acquisition Cost, normal purchase price Bill Date Full call number Accession Number Cost, replacement price Price effective from Koha item type
        NASSDOC Library NASSDOC Library 2020-07-06 OP 1091.35 2020-06-11 346.54092 RAN-I 50923 1495.00 2020-06-11 Books